|
One can only wonder about the 'ointment woman’ incident
here. Again there is criticism
from Judas about the use of the ointment. But here is Jesus in what is most
likely the nearest thing he had to a home. It is a fairly natural gesture for
Mary here not to waste the expensive ointment so she dries this off with
her hair. (Was this ointment
left over from Lazarus' burial?)
Lazarus his dear friend is reclining as the custom was, with Jesus
at the table.
It seems instead of transferring Mary over to the scene in the
Pharisee's house and presenting her with the image of a public sinner,
the gospel writer John has rather taken the incident of the ointment
woman with all its confrontation and put it into a domestic situation
where (apart from Judas) people share in mutual love, respect and
concern.
If one looks at the four accounts of the ointment woman, each is
different. Together they suggests there was a story - even a family
scandal, that went on in the background. Is this why church tradition
aligns the ointment woman with Mary Magdalen and it ignores the testimony
of John's gospel? Was Mary,
sister of Lazarus, from a prominent family of priests and unable to marry
a non-Jew? Did she actually elope to the city? Did she then realise the damage
this was doing to her family and return distraught. Even so, was she
still considered by Jews as a sinner and unclean? Was Jesus' acceptance of her
considered to be a final scandal
as to what constitutes the "type" of someone in the Kingdom of Jesus? Did John add in the story of the
woman taken in adultery because she was the ointment woman?
There are some interesting parallels here with the Tao Te Ching of Taoism! One chapter exhorts the reader to
"keep to the role of the female," and "if you are a ravine
to the empire..... you will return to being a babe", and also
"keep to the role of the disgraced." It seems Mary, sister of Lazarus
matches all of this.
|